Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, along with the UNC Center for
Civil Rights and thirty other national civil rights organizations filed an
amicus curiae brief in the U.S. Supreme Court in Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action. The case
involves a challenge to a 2006 statewide referendum in Michigan that sought to amend
the state constitution to prevent the Michigan colleges from any consideration
of race in college admissions, eliminating the narrowly tailored race conscious
admissions upheld by the Supreme Court in Grutter
v. Bollinger and recently reaffirmed in Fisher
v. University of Texas. The Center submitted briefs on behalf of UNC
Law School in Grutter and of UNC-Chapel
Hill in Fisher.
| Posted by Peter Hull Gilbert on Tue. September 24, 2013 3:38 PM
Categories: Amicus Curiae, Education, Race Discrimination
Powerful new study reveals the depths of segregation in NC and the need for intentional action to address it
Sometimes, it’s hard to say what divides North Carolinians more: race or what to do about race. A new and powerful report by some data wonks at the University of North Carolina helps to shine a light on both of these divisions. The report is entitled “The State of Exclusion: An Empirical Analysis of the Legacy of Segregated Communities in North Carolina” and the portrait it paints is not an especially encouraging one.
A team led by researcher Peter Gilbert examined hundreds of “census blocks” and population “clusters” throughout the state in an attempt to explore and explain some of the key aspects of North Carolina’s readily-evident residential segregation by race:
Where does it exist? Why does it exist? What are its impacts?
What they found shouldn’t surprise us, but it should serve as a wake-up call to all North Carolinians of good will. The three-pronged message:
- Despite decades of important progress, North Carolina remains intensely segregated in many, many areas.
- This segregation produces significant and measurable negative consequences.
- Ignoring the problem won’t make it go away.
Read the executive summary of the report.
This post was re-posted from
NC Policy Watch. - It was written by Rob Schofield
| Posted by Peter Hull Gilbert on Wed. September 18, 2013 10:14 AM
Categories: Community Inclusion, Education, Environmental Justice, Fair Housing, Segregation, Voting Rights
The UNC Center for Civil Rights filed its brief with the North Carolina Supreme Court in opposition to the State’s most recent appeal in the ongoing Leandro education litigation. The case, which began almost 20 years ago, affirmed the State’s constitutional obligation to provide a sound basic education to North Carolina children. In 2005, the Center intervened in the ongoing case on behalf of parents and children in the Charlotte-Mecklenburg school system and the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Branch of the NAACP, with the support of the North Carolina State Conference and the national NAACP.
Posted by Jennifer Watson Marsh on Tue. September 3, 2013 12:31 PM
Categories: Amicus Curiae, Charlotte-Mecklenburg, Education, Leandro, Race Discrimination
Plaintiffs and attorneys at the Eastern District Federal Courthouse in Greenville, NC.
After over five years of representing our clients, and an important victory at the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in 2012, the Center’s school desegregation case, Everett et al v. Pitt County Board of Education, went to trial in U.S. District Court in Greenville. The Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law and Dechert LLP co-counseled on the case.
Posted by Mark Dorosin on Fri. August 2, 2013 4:04 PM
Categories: Education, Pitt County, Race Discrimination, Segregation
On July 22 a trial over the issue of racial segregation of
students in Pitt County Schools (PCS) will begin at the Eastern District
Federal Courthouse in Greenville, N.C. The UNC Center for Civil Rights
(CCR) and co-counsel are representing a group of African-American parents and the Pitt
County Coalition for Educating Black Children (the plaintiffs) to
reverse a PCS student assignment plan that they assert resegregated
several schools in the district. At the same time, PCS will seek a
declaration of “unitary status” and an end to over four decades of
federal judicial oversight. A school district is considered unitary when
it has eliminated the effects of past racial segregation to the extent
This is the first major unitary status case in North Carolina since 1999.
Over 100 school districts across the South are still under court
supervision, and many advocates involved in those districts will likely
be monitoring this lawsuit to see how the case unfolds.
The UNC Center for Civil Rights are joined as Plaintiffs' counsel by the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under the Law and Dechert LLP.
Media inquiries may be directed to the UNC Law School
Communications Office (Allison Reid, 919.843.7148,
firstname.lastname@example.org) or UNC Center for Civil Rights (Bethan Eynon,
919.590.9139, email@example.com). Time permitting, Center for Civil
Rights attorneys will post updates on this blog as the trial
Posted by Taiyyaba A. Qureshi on Wed. July 17, 2013 2:05 PM
Categories: Education, Pitt County, Race Discrimination, Segregation
The Center was invited to write for Teach For America's blog, Pass
the Chalk, to commemorate the Brown v. Board of Education anniversary.
We wrote about the spectrum of segregation and resegregation in North
Carolina as an example of this disturbing nationwide trend.
Halifax community members at a rally for education equality
Although racial segregation in public schools was held unconstitutional in 1954 by
Brown v. Board of Education,
massive resistance by segregationist state and local governments
prevented meaningful implementation of this landmark ruling for over a
decade. It wasn’t until the late 1960s, and in response to community
activism, litigation, and intervention by the federal government, that
the doors of educational opportunity were finally forced open to create
equal access for children of color.
Today, almost 60 years after
its promise of an integrated and equal education remains unfulfilled. The cross-exposure of black and white students—an important measure of integration—peaked in the mid-1980s but, by 2000 was even lower than in 1968.
Posted by Taiyyaba A. Qureshi on Thu. May 16, 2013 12:09 PM
Categories: Charlotte-Mecklenburg, Education, Halifax County, Pitt County, Race Discrimination, Segregation, Wake County
Center Education Fellow Taiyyaba Qureshi, with Jason Langberg, Director of Legal Aid NC's Push Out Prevention Project, and Eldrin Deas, PhD Candidate at UNC SChool of Education, authored an article in
this month's Poverty and Race Research Action Council Journal on the need for education officials to be accountable through meaningful engagement with education stakeholders. The full article is available in the March/April PRRAC Journal.
Accountability in education must
include the idea that school systems have certain obligations to their
stakeholders. Traditional notions of accountability are mostly focused on
measuring performance outputs of students, teachers and principals, and fail to
identify metrics by which elected and appointed policymakers can be held
accountable for their actions. Unfortunately,
this trend has become even more prevalent as so-called market-based reforms (e.g.,
expanded high-stakes testing, merit pay, privitization) are adopted on the
federal, state and local levels. These policy changes in fact “de-form” democratic
principles of good governance and fairness, which require that school system
leaders be held accountable to the community. Over the past four years,
education policymakers and community advocates in Wake County, North Carolina
demonstrated that such accountability is essential to creating a healthy
relationship between the school district and the community it serves and to
producing high-quality, equitable outcomes for students.
Posted by Taiyyaba A. Qureshi on Wed. March 20, 2013 9:16 AM
Categories: Education, Wake County
The Center for Civil Rights joined a national coalition of
education and civil rights advocates calling on the US Department of Education
to encourage school diversity as a factor in grants through the Department’s
Investing in Education ("i3") fund. The Center and coalition members called on the Department to
include “promoting diversity” as a priority to be used in evaluating i3 grant
Read the coalition’s comment letter.
Posted by Taiyyaba A. Qureshi on Thu. January 17, 2013 9:48 AM
Categories: Education, Segregation
In a recent "Race and the Law" series, Center staff and UNC Law School
professors reenacted excerpts from the oral arguments in the Fisher v. University of Texas. The case was heard at the US Supreme Court on
October 10, 2012. UNC School of Law Dean Jack Boger. CCR Attorneys Mark
Dorosin and Elizabeth Haddix, and the UNC Office of University Counsel filed an an amicus brief on behalf of the University of North Carolina in this case.
Deputy Director Charles Daye played the role of Chief Justice Roberts.
Center attorneys Mark Dorosin and Elizabeth Haddix and UNC Law
professors Eric Muller, Erika Wilson, Al Brophy, and Catherine Kim
played other Justices. Community Inclusion Fellow Bethan Eynon read the
position of Petitioner Fisher, Education Fellow Taiyyaba Qureshi took
the part of Respondent University of Texas, and Equal Justice Works
Fellow Peter Gilbert acted as US Solicitor General.
Watch the video below:
Posted by Taiyyaba A. Qureshi on Mon. January 14, 2013 12:01 AM
Categories: Amicus Curiae, Education, Race and the Law Series, Race Discrimination