Skip to Main Content
North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation

Sneak Preview: The Influence of Politics at the ICTY

  • E-mail E-mail
  • Google+

By: Stuart Ford

The recent acquittals of Ante Gotovina and Ramush Haradinaj at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) have once again raised questions about the nature of the ICTY’s trials: are they predominantly legal or political? This Article attempts to answer that question through a first-of-its-kind empirical study of the ICTY’s indictments. It tests whether the ICTY’s trials are structural show trials by looking for statistically significant correlations between the components of the indictment and conviction/acquittal or sentence length. It also explores whether the indictments comply with the requirements of international criminal law, are internally consistent, and match what we understand about how serious violations of international criminal law are committed. Finally, it compares charging practices at the ICTY to charging practices in a number of domestic criminal justice systems that are broadly viewed as fair and finds that the ICTY’s charging practices fall within the range of those domestic practices. The results of this analysis suggest that the ICTY’s trials are not show trials, that they are fundamentally fair, and therefore predominantly legal in nature.

However, there is evidence that the Prosecutor has been affected by political considerations when deciding who to investigate and charge. For example, political pressure appears to partly explain the Prosecutor’s decision not to seriously investigate allegations that NATO militaries committed violations of international criminal law during NATO’s 1999 intervention in Kosovo. Similarly, there is evidence that political considerations led the Prosecutor to bring weak claims against non-Serbs partly to respond to criticisms that the ICTY was only prosecuting ethnic Serbs. These cases have failed at a disproportionately high rate, which suggests that it may not have been appropriate to proceed with them in the first place.

The full article will be available in this year’s first publication at Stuart Ford: 39 N.C. J. Int'l L. & Com. Reg. 45 (forthcoming Fall 2013).


Posted by Stephen A. Moore on Tue. October 29, 2013 8:00 AM
Categories: ICTY, International Dispute Resolution, Yugoslavia

Comments for this post are now closed.

Go to Top of Page
UNC School of Law | Van Hecke-Wettach Hall | 160 Ridge Road, CB #3380 | Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3380 | 919.962.5106


If you are seeing this, you are either using a non-graphical browser or Netscape 4.x (4.7, 4.8, etc.) and this page appears very plain. If you are using a 4.x version of Netscape, this site is fully functional but lacks styles and optimizations available in other browsers. For full functionality, please upgrade your browser to the latest version of Internet Explorer or Firefox.